The Ten Commandments of Online Discourse – a proposal
So, from repeated browses though Facebook and elsewhere, I have come to the conclusion that online discourse on science and politics is generally of poor quality. I therefore propose the following set of ten commandments to guide all such discourse in the future:
1: Thou shalt not generalise from a specific event.
2: Thou shalt verify a meme/link/whatever before thou shares it.*
3: If thou disagrees with the claims made in a meme/link/whatever, then thou shalt verify it anyway. Because maybe, thou ist wrong.**
4: An hour spent researching a subject is not equal to a lifetime spent studying it. Thou shalt accept this.
5: Thou shalt not defend thy denial as “skepticism”
6: Thou shalt not defend thy prejudice as “opinion”
7: Thou shalt not quote statistics without giving thy source.
8: Thou shalt not dismiss thy neighbour’s source without reason.
9: Thou shalt accept that “it’s from a far-right hate group” is a valid reason for thy source to be dismissed.
10: Thou shalt not frame thy personal soapbox as a set of ten commandments…
…well, I guess I’m done.
*If nothing else, try googling it and see if something like Hoax-Slayer comes up on the first page. Seriously. It takes a minute, tops.
** This one is harder, certainly. But as a rule of thumb: if you cannot think of a rebuttal that does not rely on your emotions and/or your personal beliefs, then it’s safe to say that you have a problem.
From → Uncategorized